Physical Address
Ground Floor, 79 Boulcott Street, Wellington
Postal Address P O Box 10 675, Wellington 6143
Telephone (04) 472 7852 or 0800 ADHELP (0800 234357)
Facsimile (04) 471 1785
Email asa@asa.co.nz
|
Home
Code for Environmental Claims
September 1994
Note: The spurious use of environmental claims and claims which
mislead by omission or by implication may not only bring the advertiser
into conflict with this Code and the Fair Trading Act but may also cause
confusion amongst consumers and potentially lessen their confidence
in advertising generally.
This Code covers all advertising containing claims for environmental
benefit and includes packaging shown in advertisements.
BASIC PRINCIPLES
|
1.
|
Generalised claims for environmental benefit must be assessed
on the complete life-cycle of the product and its packaging taking
into account any effects on the environment of its manufacture,
distribution, use, disposal, etc. Thus absolute claims for environmental
benefit, either stated or implied, are not appropriate.
eg "Environmentally friendly"
"Environmentally safe" "Environmentally kind"
"Product X has no effect on the environment" "100%
ecologically sound"
are absolute claims and therefore not acceptable.
|
|
2.
|
Qualified claims such as "environmentally friendlier/safer/kinder"
may be acceptable where the advertised product, service or company
can demonstrate a significant environmental advantage over its
competitors or a significant improvement on its previous formulation,
components, packaging, method of manufacture or operation.
|
|
3.
|
All claims must:
|
a.
|
be able to be substantiated, and
|
|
b.
|
meet relevant local or international standards as appropriate
if a particular benefit is claimed (eg "biodegradable",
"organic" etc), and
|
|
c.
|
explain clearly the nature of the benefit,
eg "our product X is kinder to Mother Nature"
is unclear and thus unacceptable but "our CFC-free
product X is kinder to the ozone layer" would be acceptable.
|
|
|
4.
|
Advertisements must not falsely suggest or imply official approval
for a product, whether by words, symbols or any other means.
|
|
5.
|
Claims based on the absence of a harmful chemical or damaging
effect are not acceptable when other products in the category
do not include the chemical or cause the effect.
|
|
6.
|
Scientific terminology is acceptable provided it is relevant
and used in a way that can be readily understood by consumers
without specialist knowledge.
|
Top
|