Latest Decisions: Tall Poppy radio ad did not breach Code, advocacy advertising, and more
The following decisions have been released to the ASA website:
- Complaint 21/157 Edward and Co, Carolyn Taylor, Instagram, Settled
- Complaint 21/163 Arvida Group, Copper Crest Lifestyle Village, Print, Settled
- Complaint 21/183 ANZ NZ, Television, No Grounds to Proceed
- Complaint 21/188 Flame Pizza, Facebook, Settled
- Complaint 21/197 New Zealand Taxpayers Union, Twitter, No Grounds to Proceed
- Complaint 21/227 TVNZ, Ru Paul Drag Race, Billboard, No Grounds to Proceed
- Complaint 21/245 Voice of Islam, Billboard, No Grounds to Proceed
- Complaint 21/247 North Beach, Sign, No Grounds to Proceed
- Complaint 21/252 Coca Cola Amatil New Zealand, Digital Marketing, No Grounds to Proceed
- Complaint 21/254 Flight Centre, Television, No Grounds to Proceed
- Complaint 21/255 Mercury Energy, Television, No Grounds to Proceed
- Complaint 21/256 The Real News, Unaddressed Mail, No Jurisdiction
- Complaint 21/200 Instant Finance Television, No Grounds to Proceed
- Complaint 21/201 Eyebody Unaddressed Mail, Settled
- Complaint 21/213 Harmoney, Television, No Grounds to Proceed
- Complaint 21/222 NZ Bus, Out of Home, Settled
- Complaint 21/232 @Zarnia_oldham, Instagram, Settled
- Complaint 21/241 @carolyntaylor, Instagram, Settled
- Complaint 21/088 Airbonne, @Danellekendrick, Instagram, Settled
- Complaint 21/181 Allsports Distribution, @Gavbubu, Instagram, Settled
- Complaint 21/192 Department of Internal Affairs, Keep it Real Online, Cinema, Settled – Media Error
- Complaint 21/193 Cordbank Limited and Simone Anderson, Facebook and Instagram, Not Upheld
- Complaint 21/230 Do Terra, @eversobritty, Instagram, Settled
- Complaint 21/233 @Pebbles_hooper_, Instagram, No Grounds to Proceed
- Complaint 21/242 Seedandsapling & Edwardsandcobaby, @casarahmarycooper, Instagram, Settled
- Complaint 21/246 Beaver Tree Service, Print, Settled
- Complaint 21/272 Tourism Australia, Television, No Grounds to Proceed
- Complaint 21/274 ACT Party, Linkedin, No Grounds to Proceed
- Complaint 21/150 Deaf Aotearoa, Sign Language Week, Television, No Grounds to Proceed
- Complaint 21/182 Fire and Emergency, Television, No Grounds to Proceed
- Complaint 21/209 Lynne Flood, Website, Settled
- Complaint 21/211 House of Health, Website, Settled
- Complaint 21/221 The Griffin’s Food Company, ETA Ripples, Television, No Grounds to Proceed
- Complaint 21/231 Under Armour, @lous-fitness, Instagram, Settled
- Complaint 21/235 Ryderwear, @gracehemadevos, Instagram, Settled
- Complaint 21/238 @sam_lowe, Instagram, Settled
- Complaint 21/240 @claudiaconaglen, Instagram, Settled
- Complaint 21/253 Treasure Box, Website, Settled
- Complaint 21/215 Voices for Freedom, Unaddressed Mail, Upheld in part
- Complaint 21/217 Pharmabroker Sales Ltd, Television, No Grounds to Proceed
- Complaint 21/225 Ray White New Brighton, Website, No Grounds to Proceed
- Complaint 21/270 Deaf Aotearoa, Television, No Grounds to Proceed
- Complaint 21/288 GiGi NZL, Billboard, No Grounds to Proceed
- Complaint 21/136 Harvey Norman, Website, Not Upheld
- Complaint 21/208 The Trusts, Print, Not Upheld
- Complaint 21/220 McDonalds, Television, Not Upheld
- Complaint 21/228 Tall Poppy Real Estate, Radio, Not Upheld
- Complaint 21/248 Family First, Love them Both, Sign, Upheld
- Complaint 21/250 Lion, Speights, Facebook, Not Upheld
- Complaint 21/273 Kathmandu, Television, No Grounds to Proceed
- Complaint 21/275 Clean Collective, Rinse Vodka, Facebook, Settled
- Complaint 21/276 Trade Me Limited, Television, No Grounds to Proceed
- Complaint 21/285 Partners Life, Television, No Grounds to Proceed
- Complaint 21/291 Smart Vent, Television, No Grounds to Proceed
- Complaint 21/301 Life Direct, Television, No Grounds to Proceed
- Complaint 21/303 McDonalds, Television, No Grounds to Proceed
- Complaint 21/305 ASB Bank, Youtube, No Grounds to Proceed
- Complaint 21/308 Energy Online, Television, No Grounds to Proceed
- Complaint 21/311 Natune Heal, Digital Marketing, Settled
- Complaint 21/312 Mothers Matter, Television, No Grounds to Proceed
Tall Poppy radio ad did not breach Code
The radio advertisement for Tall Poppy Real Estate said “Kāpiti and Horowhenua Community Notices, with Tall Poppy Real Estate – They’ve saved New Zealanders $53 million and counting…Tall Poppy, a home-grown Kiwi business with a fresh take on real estate. Licensed REAA 2008.”
The Complainant was concerned the claim regarding the amount Tall Poppy Real Estate has saved New Zealanders was misleading, as real estate commissions had reduced in recent years and the advertiser would not know what fees their competitors were charging.
In their response, the Advertiser said the amount quoted is based on an algorithm which compares their fee structure with established commission rates, was regularly reviewed to reflect the market, and was also based on the premise that if Tall Poppy were not in the market, competitor agencies would charge the higher fees listed in their contracts instead of discounting to meet their rates.
The majority of the Complaints Board ruled the advertisement was not misleading, noting the Advertiser had provided sufficient information to explain how the figure of $53 million was calculated. The majority noted this information was available on the Tall Poppy website and the formula used supported the figure quoted in the advertisement.
In accordance with the majority, the Complaints Board ruled the complaint was Not Upheld.
Advocacy ads must sufficiently disclose advertiser identity
The Family First billboard advertisement depicted a close up of a pregnant woman with the text “Human rights begin in the womb.” The advertisement includes the website address “LoveThemBoth.nz”
The Complainant was concerned the identity of the Advertiser was not obvious on the billboard or on the website listed in the advertisement. The Complainant said the position of the Advertiser, namely opposing the Abortion Legislation Act was not made clear on the advertisement.
The Complaints Board considered the complaint and said while the position of the advertiser was clear, the lack of information on the identity of the Advertiser, Family First, meant it was likely consumers could be misled or confused about which organisation was responsible for the advertisement.
The Complaints Board said the URL on the advertisement, “lovethemboth.nz” took the consumer to a website which did not make it clear to consumers that Family First was the Advertiser until the last page of the website in very small font. The Complaints Board also noted the ‘Contact Us’ tab on the website did not indicate to consumers that Family First were responsible for the content.
The Complaints Board ruled the complaint was Upheld, and the advertisement to be removed or amended.