The competitor complaints process gives fast and thorough consideration to competitor complaints for the benefit of consumers and to ensure a level playing field for industry. It is a user-pays process where all parties have ample opportunity to put their cases, however, the overriding consideration is making a fair, fast decision, based solely on the Advertising Codes. Once a decision is made, offending advertisements are requested to be withdrawn.
Provide a detailed complaint citing the provisions of the Advertising Codes you believe to have been breached and enclosing copies of the relevant advertisement/s.
Please note as part of our process, you need to provide your name, address, email and phone number and the name of the organisation you represent.
Where you provide us with personal information about someone else, you confirm you have authority or approval to do so and it is relevant to progress a competitor complaint made to the ASA.
The Chair of the Complaints Board will consider whether the complaint is suitable to be dealt with in the competitor complaints process – this consideration can occur within 24 hours if urgency is requested.
Depending on the nature of the complaint, an independent Investigator/ Auditor may be appointed to interview the parties and provide a report.
A copy of the complaint including your name (and / or other names you have provided) and organisation is circulated to the advertiser, agency and media involved, with a response sought within seven days. The Competitor Complaints process requires transparency between parties though they are asked not to contact you directly and to address all correspondence relating to the complaint to the ASA.
The hearing date is set after that deadline. One of the procedural rules is:
“The Complainant shall waive the right to take or continue proceedings against the advertiser, publisher or broadcaster concerned.”
This is to avoid the possibility of the decision being used as a ‘trial run’ for any further action. The Complainant will also be sent an invoice for the hearing fee.
With the written comments of all parties and the independent Investigator/Auditor’s report (if required) circulated to parties beforehand, the hearing is held. You have the opportunity to speak to your submission and refute your opponent’s arguments. The process is not unduly formal, more akin to a robust board meeting than a court case, and usually takes around two hours.
The Adjudication Panel will come to a decision and it will be circulated within about seven days. If your complaint is upheld, the advertiser, agency and media are requested to withdraw or amend the offending material. In accordance with the industry’s self-regulatory principles, compliance is excellent. The whole process from initial complaint to final decision can be expected to take about twenty days. It can be longer depending on the level of co-operation from parties. It is important to note that the decision of the Panel will be full and final and that there is no appeal procedure within the competitor complaints process.
As part of our commitment to an open and transparent process, we release all our rulings and decisions to the public and the media via our website. Your name and the name of the organisation you represent will be recorded in the decision.
How much does it cost?
The following table outlines applicable fees (+ GST).
|Stage 1. Complaint accepted but does not proceed||No charge||No charge|
|Stage 2. Initial letter sent, but complainant withdraws or complaint settled||$3,000||$3,000|
|Stage 3. Responses received, agenda prepared. Complainant withdraws or complaint settled||$5,000||$7,500|
|Stage 4. Complainant proceeds with adjudication, hearing takes place||$10,000||$15,000|
There is no fee for advertisers, agencies or media to defend themselves against competitor complaints. If the complaint is upheld then, in accordance with self-regulatory principles, the advertiser is requested to voluntarily pay the hearing fee, which is refunded to the complainant on receipt.
Do I need a lawyer?
This is up to you – a number of lawyers are familiar with the ASA process and legal representatives appear in around 50% of competitor complaints. It should be remembered, however, that disputes are about specific advertisements and whether they breach the Codes, not about complicated or technical points of law. You may find it preferable to argue your case yourself.
Is the system better than the courts?
This depends on the outcome you are looking for. Although the Complaints Board cannot issue a Court Order, the Adjudication Panel can provide a much speedier resolution with an offending advertisement withdrawn quickly. It is also likely to cost many thousands of dollars less.
It should be noted that once both parties agree to the complaint being dealt with through the Complaints Board system, they are required to forego the option of civil action through the courts. If you are seeking damages and/or costs from your competitor, this should be done through the normal court procedures.
How can I speed up the process?
You can ensure there are no delays by obtaining a copy of the advertisement as quickly as possible and including your agreement to pay the fee when you initially lodge your complaint.
Can I still complain under the consumer process?
No. Experience over many years has shown that competitor complaints are by their nature much more complex and that the free consumer complaints service is quite unsuitable. There is also no right of appearance for the parties involved.
Need to know more?
If you would like further information or have any questions about the competitor complaints process, please contact the Senior Case Manager at the ASA on (04) 472 7852.
Filing a complaint
Address your complaint to The Secretary, Advertising Standards Complaints Board, via email to firstname.lastname@example.org or P.O. Box 10-675, Wellington 6143.